There is a clear anti-Mourinho section of the Tottenham fan base, it may even be the case that they are in the majority, though there is no scientific evidence of that.
But there is certainly a sizeable portion that wants the Portuguese out, however, the same could be said of ENIC, Daniel Levy and some of the players.
And therein lies the problem.
I am very doubtful that those that want Mourinho out are satisfied with everything else going on at the club. I suspect that a vast majority of them also want ENIC and Levy out and of course, a bunch of so-called deadwood players.
So, assuming that is correct and I believe it is, then what exactly would be achieved if Mourinho is given the boot?
If ENIC stays, if those deadwood players stay and if Levy is still in charge of recruitment then what can a new manager do that is better than what Mourinho and Pochettino have done?
If you believe that a new manager would do better then the logical conclusion is that ENIC is not at fault, the deadwood players are not at fault and absolutely Levy is not at fault.
If the real issue does lie with the owners, board and poor players then sacking Mourinho would clearly not be enough.
See where I am coming from?
It is fine to sack Mourinho if you believe a new manager will do a better job with the deadwood players, stingy owners and incompetent chairman but what is the point if it will make no difference?
In my opinion, sacking Mourinho will make little to no difference, in fact, it could set the club back even further, the problems run far deeper at Spurs and have done so for a while.