Glenn Hoddle says he doesn’t expect Daniel Levy to allow Harry Kane to join Chelsea even if the England captain eventually leaves Tottenham.
Kane has asked to leave this summer and it remains unclear if he would go the extra yard and hand in a transfer request.
The striker is one of the best in the world and would be the leading man in any team.
The likes of Real Madrid and Barcelona have been linked with a move for him at some point in his career, however, it seems he would likely remain in the Premier League.
Manchester City, Manchester United and Chelsea have been linked with a move for him as they look to bolster their squads.
A move to Manchester looks more likely because of Chelsea’s relationship with Tottenham.
Levy doesn’t like selling to a direct rival, but he seems to have a special reluctance for doing deals with Chelsea.
Hoddle says that the Spurs supremo will not want to deal with the Blues opening the door to a potential move to the North West.
Hoddle said via Sun Sports: “The key factor in Harry Kane’s future is that he has three years left on his contract at Tottenham.
“If he only had a year or two left then I think it would be done and dusted that he’d leave them this summer.
“He could go to Manchester City. What would he achieve there, if he’s already Premier League top goalscorer at Tottenham?
“I’d hate to think he’d go to Chelsea but I don’t think Daniel Levy will let him go there instead of City or United.
“Kane has been brilliant for Spurs and it really is a sad situation.
“Tottenham only really have themselves to blame for not building on the season when they go to the Champions League final.”
Thats what Hod is saying , just think what he could achieve at City. Its lost in translation. However , is it an achievment. Just loads of dosh & ready made meal. What could Spurs achieve if we had owners like City & Chelsea. As ive said, before their dosh , we had as many trophies as them put together
It was when we came 2nd & looked the real deal that we should have got 2 or 3 top players to finish the job. Even without backing we were 3rd following year. Even Graeme Souness said “ we are that close” but ENIC did diddly squat.
Rhetorical question mate, Hoddle was making a point… Berbs only lasted a year or 2 at United… What about Walker to City? Also a key player kidnapped.
What would Kane achieve if he went to City?Come on Glenn you’re better than that.Do you honetly think the limit of Harry’s ambitions is top league scorer for Spurs.
On the subject of transfers Liverpool paid the release clause on Konate from Leipzig because they wanted a good defender,now he’s theirs.Not difficult is it?I guess that is the difference in attitude between a football club and a property investment company.
Also it is suggested City are interested in Grealish and would pay 100M.Imagine Levy creaming himself at the thought,if only he hadn’t offered Poundland money for him when he had the chance and Villa were on the brink.Probably 80M profit disappearing before his eyes.
What are we left with?
At last a lad with common sence ..it pisses me off having Chelsea named as possible destination..not a hope in hell would li d that happen..and as for tomorrows champions league final they can shove that 2..two rotten clubs that won the lottery.Those clubs are what is rotten to the core about football..ohh and my ex is a C–T..
What does Hoddle mean, “…what would he achieve at City?”
Trophies Hoddle, Trophies.
Levy wouldn’t let him go to Chelsea or Man.U.
I’m sure Levy hasn’t forgotten the Berbatov kidnap.
What
Love Glenn, but Tottenham aren’t to blame for the mess the club is in. That’s down to one man.
I know it’s difficult for some ex players who might still work for the club to actually name names.