Cristian “Cuti” Romero was officially named Spurs’ new club captain in August 2025, following Heung-min Son’s departure to the MLS.
This decision by manager Thomas Frank came after Romero had served as vice-captain since 2023 alongside James Maddison.
At 27, the Argentine World Cup winner has been a cornerstone of Spurs’ defence since joining from Atalanta in 2021, and his appointment was widely praised for his on-pitch leadership and passion.
However, by late November 2025, opinions had become more mixed, with criticisms emerging around his discipline, availability, and off-field presence.
Romero embodies the warrior-like qualities that align with Spurs’ identity under Frank’s high-intensity style. His appointment wasn’t a surprise, after all, Thomas Frank highlighted Romero’s ability to “lead from his behaviour on the pitch” and “drive the team forward,” noting his consistent pushing of standards on and off the field.
This may be backed by tangible achievements, but was this, at least in part, at least, a political appointment?
Red flags in respect of Cuti?
Despite the hype, Romero’s profile raises red flags for sustained leadership, especially in the Premier League’s pressure cooker.
Recent events have amplified doubts: Known for his fiery temperament, Romero has accumulated red cards and suspensions, including one for dissent in November this year. Past seasons saw him sent off multiple times, and while his aggression fuels wins, it risks costly errors against top sides.
Injuries have plagued Cuti: last season, he played just 43% of possible games (26/60 appearances). As captain, this is unforgivable; one analyst called for it to “double at the very least.” Surely a captain HAS to be reliable?
Recent poor showings, like a terrible display against Arsenal, where he was like a traffic cone for three goals, have led to calls to sell him from some frustrated fans.
Post-loss media duties have fallen to Guglielmo Vicario, not Romero, prompting backlash: “Where is our captain? Hiding away after that.” His English proficiency has improved, but limited communication could hinder squad unity in tough moments.
Our Conclusion isn’t joyous
Not always available to play, incapable of providing post-match interviews, and appearing to lose conviction in tough games are unappealing traits. Worse yet, there’s an uncomfortable backstory with discipline. Would it really be a terrible idea to give someone else a go?
